Study on the Concurrent Role of Phonological Processing and Visual Perception Abilities in Word Reading in Arabic- A Follow-up Study
Keywords:
phonological processing, visual perceptual, word reading, Arabic orthographyAbstract
The purpose of this follow-up study was to determine the specific contribution of phonological processing abilities, including phonological awareness (PA), rapid automatized naming (RAN) and verbal short-term memory (VSTM), as well as visual perception (VP), in word reading accuracy. A sample of 62 native Arabic speaking children from Grade 1 participated in study, were subdivided into typical readers (n= 42) and poor readers (n=20). Along with a diagrammatic representations test to assess visual perception, phonological processing tasks included syllable deletion, RAN objects, and pseudo-word repetition, in addition to word and pseudo-word reading tests. Participants were tested in grade 1 using the phonological and VP tasks and one year later in grade 2 using the same tasks in addition to the reading test. The main research hypotheses stipulated that typical and poor readers differ significantly in all the phonological and VP measures. It was also hypothesized that phonological and VP processing abilities contribute independently to the prediction of word reading accuracy for the entire sample. The results showed that the two groups differ significantly in PA and VSTM which were assessed in Grade 1, and in PA and VP assessed in grade 2. More importantly, hierarchical regression analyses showed that among the three phonological processing skills, PA as assessed in both grade 1 and grade 2 was the unique predictor of word reading accuracy after controlling for age and the Raven's matrices for nonverbal abstract reasoning. Visual perception also contributed significantly to the prediction of reading but only when assessed in grade 2. The findings demonstrate the key role of both PA and VP for the early development of word reading accuracy in Arabic.
References
APA (2000). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV TR). American Psychiatric Association, Washington DC.
Asadi, I. (2017). Reading Arabic with the diacritics for short vowels: vowelised but not necessarily easy to read. Writing Systems Research, 9 (2), 137-147.
Auld, M., Boyd, R., Moseley, G., & Johnston, L. (2011). Tactile assessment in children with cerebral palsy: a clinimetric review. Physical Occupation Therapeutics & Pediatry, 31, 413-439
Bellocchi, S., Muneaux, M., Huau, A., Lévêque, Y., Jover, M., & Ducrot, S. (2017). Exploring the link between visual perception, visual-motor integration, and reading in normal developing and impaired children using DTVP-2. Dyslexia, 23, 296-315.
Bezrukikh, M.M., & Terebova, N.N. (2009). Characteristics of the development of visual perception in five- to seven-year-old children. Human Physiology, 35, 684–689.
Boets, B. (2014). Dyslexia: Reconciling controversies within an integrative developmental perspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 501–503.
Boudelaa, S., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2004). Abstract morphemes and lexical representation: The CV-Skeleton in Arabic. Cognition, 92(3), 271–303.
Burtner, P., Dukeminier, A., Ben, L., Qualls, C., & Scott, K. (2006). Visual perceptual skills and related school functions in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. New Zealand Journal of Occupational Therapy, 53, 24–29.
Catts, H. W., Compton, D., Tomblin, J. B., & Bridges, M. S. (2012). Prevalence and nature of late-emerging poor readers. Journal of educational psychology, 104(1), 10.1037/a0025323. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025323
Cheng, D., Xiao, Q., Chen, Q., Cui J., & Zhou, X. (2018). Dyslexia and dyscalculia are characterized by common visual perception deficits, Developmental Neuropsychology, 43, 497-507.
Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
Facoetti, A., Ruffino, M., Peru, A., Paganoni, P., & Chelazzi, L. (2008). Sluggish engagement and disengagement of non-spatial attention in dyslexic children. Cortex, 44(9), 1221–1233.
Franceschini, S., Gori, S., Ruffino, M., Pedrolli, K., & Facoetti, A. (2012). A causal link between visual spatial attention and reading acquisition. Current Biology, 22(9), 814–819.
Frick, A., & Newcombe, N.S. (2015). Young children's perception of diagrammatic representations. Spatial Cognition & Computation, 15, 227-245.
Fusco, N., Germano. G.D., & Capellini, S.A. (2015). Efficacy of a perceptual and visual-motor skill intervention program for students with dyslexia. Codas, 27, 128-134.
Georgiou, G., Parrila, R. & Kirby, J.R. (2009). RAN components and reading development from Grade 3 to Grade 5: What underlies their relationship? Scientific Studies of Reading, 13, 508–534.
Germano, G. D., Reilhac, C., Capellini, S. A., & Valdois ,S. (2014). The phonological and visual basis of developmental dyslexia in Brazilian Portuguese reading children. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1169.
Giovagnoli, G., Vicari, S., Tomassetti, S., & Menghini, D. (2016). The role of visual-spatial abilities in dyslexia: age differences in children’s reading? Frontiers in Psychology, 7. 1997. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01997
Goswami, U. (2003). Why theories about developmental dyslexia require developmental designs. Trends in cognitive sciences, 7(12), 534–540.
Hautus, M., Setchell, G., Waldie, K., & Kirk, I. (2003). Age-related improvements in auditory temporal resolution in reading-impaired children. Dyslexia, 9. 37-45.
Hawelka S., Huber C., & Wimmer H. (2006). Impaired visual processing of letter and digit strings in adult dyslexic readers. Vision Research, 46, 718–723
Hulme, C., Bowyer-Crane, C., Carroll, J. M., Duff, F. J., & Snowling, M. J. (2012). The causal role of phoneme awareness and letter-sound knowledge in learning to read: combining intervention studies with mediation analyses. Psychological Science, 23(6), 572–577.
Hulme, C., & Snowling, M.J. (2009). Developmental disorders of language learning and cognition. New Jersey, USA: John Wiley & Sons.
Ibrahim A. A., Ibrahim, R., & Khateb, A. (2017). What contributes to spelling in Arabic? A cross-sectional study from first to sixth grade, Writing Systems Research, 9 (1), 60-81.
Jones, M. W., Branigan, H. P., & Kelly, M. L. (2008). Visual deficits in developmental dyslexia: relationships between non-linguistic visual tasks and their contribution to components of reading. Dyslexia, 14, 95–115.
Kavale, K. A., & Forness, S. R. (2000). Auditory and visual perception processes and reading ability: a quantitative reanalysis and historical reinterpretation. Learning Disability Quarterly, 23, 253–270.
Khateb, A., Michel, C. M., Pegna, A. J., O'Dochartaigh, S. D., Landis, T., & Annoni, J. M. (2003). Processing of semantic categorical and associative relations: an ERP mapping study. International journal of psychophysiology, 49(1), 41–55.
Kibby, M.Y., Dyer, S.M., Vadnais, S.A., Jagger, A.C., Casher, G.A., & Stacy, M. (2015). Visual processing in reading disorders and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and its contribution to basic reading ability. Frontiers in Psychology. 6, 1635. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01635
Lachmann, T., & Geyer, T. (2003). Letter reversals in dyslexia: Is the case really closed? A critical review and conclusions. Psychologische Beitrage, 45, 50–70.
Layes, S., Cohen, M., and van Viersen, S. (2022). The triple-deficit hypothesis in Arabic: Evidence from children with and without dyslexia. Applied Psycholinguistics. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0142716422000327
Layes, S., Khenfour, H., Lalonde, R., & Rebai, M. (2019). Orthographic and morphological masked priming effects in Arabic: evidence from lexical decision task in children with and without dyslexia. Reading Psychology, 40, 243-268.
Mann, V., & Wimmer, H. (2002). Phoneme awareness and pathways into literacy: A comparison of German and American children. Reading and Writing, 15, 653-682.
McBride-Chang, C., Lam, F., Lam, C., Chan, B., Fong, C.Y., Wong, T.T., & Wong, S.W. (2011). Early predictors of dyslexia in Chinese children: familial history of dyslexia, language delay, and cognitive profiles. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 52 (2), 204-11.
Melby-Lervåg, M., Lyster, S-A., & Hulme, C. (2012). Phonological skills and their role in learning to read: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 322-352.
Menghini, D., Finzi, A., Benassi, M., Bolzani, R., Facoetti, A., Giovagnoli, S., Ruffino, M., & Vicari, S. (2010), Different underlying neurocognitive deficits in developmental dyslexia: A comparative study. Neuropsychologia, 48, 863-872.
Mesman, G.R., & Kibby, M.Y. (2011). An examination of multiple predictors of orthographic functioning. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44, 50–62.
Nelson, J. M., Lindstrom J. H., Lindstrom W., & Denis D. (2012). The structure of phonological processing and its relationship to basic reading. Exceptionality 20 179–196.
Ortiz, R., Estévez, A., Muñetón, M., & Domínguez, C. (2014). Visual and auditory perception in preschool children at risk for dyslexia. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35, 2673–2680.
Pennington, B.F. (2006). From single to multiple deficit models of developmental disorders. Cognition, 101, 385.
Peterson, R. L., & Pennington, B. F. (2012). Developmental dyslexia. Lancet, 379, 1997-2007.
Peterson, R. L., & Pennington, B. F. (2015). Developmental Dyslexia. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 37, 283–307.
Plaza, M. (2003). The role of naming speed, phonological processing and morphological/syntactic skill in the reading and spelling performance of second-grade children. Current psychology letters, 10, 1.//journals.openedition.org/cpl/88
Powell, D., Stainthorp, R., Stuart, M., Garwood, H., & Quinlan, P. (2007). An experimental comparison between rival theories of rapid automatized naming performance and its relationship to reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 98(1), 46–68.
Provazza, S., Adams, A-M., Giofrè, D & Roberts, D.J. (2019). Double trouble: visual and phonological impairments in English dyslexic readers. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2725. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02725
Ramus, F., & Ahissar, M. (2012). Developmental dyslexia: the difficulties of interpreting poor performance, and the importance of normal performance. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 29(1-2), 104–122.
Retief, S.A., & Heimburge, J.A. (2006). How to reach and teach all children in the inclusive classroom, 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Joshi R.M. (Eds.). (2014). Handbook of Arabic Literacy: Insights and Perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.
Seidenberg, M. (2017). Language at the speed of sight. how we read, why so many can’t, and what can be done about it. New York: Basic Books.
Schneck, C.M. (2005). Visual perception. In: Case-Smith, J. (ed) Occupational therapy in Children, 5th ed. Missouri: Elservier Mosby, 412-446.
Schneck, C.M. (2009). Occupational Therapy Intervention: Performance Areas. Retrieved from: www.chirocredit.com/downloads/pediatrics/pediatrics226.pdf
Seymour, P. H., Aro, M., & Erskine, J. M. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953), 94(Pt 2), 143–174.
Snowling, M.J. (2000). Dyslexia, second edition. Oxford Blackwell.
Sortor, J.M. & Kulp, M. T. (2003). Are the results of the beery-buktenica developmental test of visual-motor integration and its sub-tests related to achievement test scores? Optometry and Vision Science, 80(11), 758-763.
Stefanics, G., Kimura, M., & Czigler, I. (2011). Visual mismatch negativity reveals automatic detection of sequential regularity violation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 46.
Stein, J., & Walsh, V. (1997). To see but not to read; the magnocellular theory of dyslexia. Trends in neurosciences, 20(4), 147–152.
Taha, H. (2013). Reading and spelling in Arabic: linguistic and orthographic complexity. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3, 721-727.
Taha, H., & Khateb, A. (2013). Resolving the orthographic ambiguity during visual word recognition in Arabic: an event-related potential investigation. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 7, 821. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00821.
Tibi, S. (2010). Developmental hierarchy of Arabic phonological awareness skills. International Journal of Special Education, 25(1), 27-33.
Vidyasagar, T.R., & Pammer, K. (2010). Dyslexia: a deficit in visuo-spatial attention, not in phonological processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 57–63.
Wagner, R. K., & Torgesen, J. K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192-212.
Wagner, R.K., Zirps, F.A., Edwards, A.A., Wood, S.G., & Beal, B. (2020). The Prevalence of Dyslexia: A New Approach to Its Estimation. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 53, 354–365.
Yang, L.; Li, C.; Li, X.; Zhai, M.; An, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, J.; Weng, X. (2022). Prevalence of Developmental Dyslexia in Primary School Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Brain Sci., 12, 240.
Zhao, J., Qian, Y., Bi, H. Y., & Coltheart, M. (2014). The visual magnocellular-dorsal dysfunction in Chinese children with developmental dyslexia impedes Chinese character recognition. Scientific Reports, 4, 7068.
Zhou, Y., Mcbride-Chang, C., & Wong, N. (2014). What is the role of visual skills in learning to read? Frontiers in psychology. 5. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00776.
Ziegler, J. C., Bertrand, D., To´th, D., Cse´pe, V., Reis, A., Faı´sca, L., & Blomert, L. (2010). Orthographic depth and its impact on universal predictors of reading: A cross-language investigation. Psychological Science, 21, 551–559.
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
By submitting to AJAL, authors agree to the following terms:
- Authors grant the journal right of first publication, with the work for an indefinite period of time after publication.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
